Review CZ12

 

Woke broo and sist, kali ini gue mau post tentang film yang baru gue tonton. Judulnya kayak judul diatas CZ12 Chinese Zodiak. Yaaa udah bukan suatu yang wah lagi lah kalo banyak orang yang suka nonton film yang dibintangin sama si ganteng satu ini. Yoi, siapa lagi kalo bukan masbro Jackie Chan. Dari jaman dulu sampe sekarang gue paling suka kalo nonton filmnya doi tuh. Yaa gimana enggak, kalo udah berantem, beh keren beud dah haha.

Aktor Hebat
Yoo udah jelas lah ya dia aktor hebat dengan segudang prestasi dan penghargaan2 yang udah dia dapet dan tentunya emang gak bisa gue sebutin satu per satu (emang gatau padahal haha). Yang gue suka tuh dari aktingnya, kalo pas adegan berantem itu lhoo. Iya, kalo adegan berantem pasti deh selalu ada sisipan guyonan kalo bahasa sunda bodor lah. Gimana ga ngakak coba nonton berantem yang kocak2 gitu. Mulai dari nyembuhin kaki rekannya yang patah, dikejar anjing, mau terbang pake parasut tapi landasannya kurang, sampe kakinya dia sendiri yang ketiban peti haha itu lucu buanget hahaha. *Brb ngakak

Oke, cukuplah intro tentang si aktornya. Sekarang gue mau cerita filmnya. Jadi, pada zaman dahulu di China itu ada kerajaan Old Summer Palace di Beijing (kalo ga salah ya). Nah kerajaan megah itu memiliki 12 macam patung kepala hewan yang melambangkan zodia cina. Terus, pada zaman dahulu di kerajaan itu juga terdapat 12 air mancur yang akan menyala pada siang hari. Kerajaan itu awalnya damai tentram, namun semuanya berubah ketika negara api menyerang haha. Bukan deng, tapi gara-gara ada perang terus diserbu sama pasukan Perancis dan Inggris. Akhirnya patung-patung itu saat ini menjadi barang2 antik, langka, yang harganya sangat mahal. Nah, kolektor benda2 antik dari berbagai negara pada pengen ngoleksi patung itu dari pelelangan. Tapi pelelangan ini ga cuma ngelelang patung itu doang sih. Pelelangan ini juga kontroversial, banyak mengandung unsur pro kontra dari masyarakat di berbagai belahan dunia (widih bahasanya berat). Terus Jackie Chan yang di film ini disebut JC disuruh sama orang buat nyari patung di kediaman seorang kolektor.

Hmm lama-lama males juga cerita panjang lebar.

Oke intinya ginilah, tadinya kan si JC itu disuruh orang buat nyari patung2 itu, tapi berhubung si JC itu kayak suatu komplotan gitu yaa dia nyuri apa yang bisa dicuri. Dia juga nemu barang2 antik dari mesir, korea, dll. Terus dalam perjalanannya mencari pantung dia ketemu Catherine sama aktivis organisasi yang peduli sama barang2 antik gitu. Salah satu aktivisnya orang Cina juga. Panjang cerita, pokoknya akhirnya si JC dan komplotannya itu jadi baik deh. Akhirnya dia ngumpulin patung2 itu buat dikembaliin lagi ke Cina sampe dia rela mempertaruhkan nyawanya sendiri. Akhirnya, banyak barang2 dari lelangan itu yang dikembaliin ke negara asalnya.

Sekarang gue mau menilai filmnya. Ha ha ha
Oke sebelum gue posting ini, sebelumnya gue udah baca2 komen orang dan review orang tentang film ini (kepo banget ya gue haha). Yaa, banyak yang suka banyak juga yang nyela. Tapi menurut gue, mereka yang nyela (baca:mencela) film ini tanpa memberi kritik dan saran yang membangun adalah orang yang sirik haha.

Yaa menurut gue sih overall film ini bagus kok. Apalagi kalo happy ending hehe. Sedikit kritik aja, plot filmnya tuh sedikit kurang jelas dan kecepetan juga. Bukan kecepetan durasinya ya, orang durasinya aja 125 menit haha. Point lebihnya ada di teknologinya yang udah lebih maju dari film2sebelumnya. Terus menurut gue juga, filmnya tuh agak "kasar". Maksudnya tuh ga kayak film Bollywood eh salah maksudnya Hollywood. Yaa maksdunya tuh kalo film hollywood tuh lebih "lembut" gue bingung juga sih ngejelasinnya. Tapi maksud gue tuh dari sisi filmnya. Mungkin latarnya, teknik pengambilan gambarnya, atau apanya lah itu. Padahal sayang lho, punya aktor sehebat itu kalo ga di dukung sama kualitas film yang bagus :)

Oke sekian dulu dari gue
Sampai bertemu di postingan selanjutnya
Wassalam

waaaah, sorry bangeettt
sibuk sekali, dengan kegiatan di kampus (padahal banyak gabut juga)
jadinya ga sempet posting lagi

tapi nanti kedepannya gue mau berniat nyicil nyicil lagi ngepost apa aja yang gue bisa lah haha
sebenernya gue pengen posting banyak hal, tapi gue terpaku dengan postingan gue sebelumnya yang tentang chemist the explorer itu lhoo

gue belum bisa bikin postingan tentang chemist the explorer, padahal seru banget loh
yaaa, walaupun gue ga bisa posting sekarang tapi overall acaranya seru banget kok
maaf ya gue cuman bisa ngasih gambaran abstraknya aja haha

owkaayy, gue hari ini cuman mau cerita yang begitu ajalah yaa
berhubung mau ujian matsa (matematika sains)
padahal gatau juga gue bakal belajar apa engga hehe
HAP. Okey kali ini gue harus belajar.

Ooooh iyaaaa, jadi kepikiran
mending lain kali nanti gue post soal-soal aja kali yaaa haha (gamau repot)

baiklah, segitu dulu saja yaa
sampai nanti di postingan selanjutnya
wassalam

Comunity Service Cooming Soon

Hari ini gue ga mau posting apa-apa. Cuman mau ngasih tau aja besok anak-anak  

KIMIA ITB 2011

mau ngadain Comunity Service di SMPN 8 Bandung yang berjudul

Chemist The Explorer. Nah, penasaran dan mau tau gimana acaranya ?

Nanti ya tunggu postingan gue selanjutnya hehe :D

#ComservKimiaITB2011

Lirik dan Kord Separuh Aku - NOAH

Intro: Bm D G-Em A  2x

Bm
Dan terjadi lagi
G              Em                A
Kisah lama yang terulang kembali
Bm                         D
Kau terluka lagi
Em   G                      A
Dari cinta rumit yang kau jalani


G        A        Bm
Aku ingin kau merasa
D           A              Bm
Kamu mengerti aku mengerti kamu
G        A       Bm
Aku ingin kau sadari
Em     G           F#
Cintamu bukanlah dia

B-D#m              G#m
Dengar laraku
B          D#m                 E
Suara hati ini memanggil namamu
C#m       F#
Karna separuh aku
E
Dirimu

Bm D G-Em A

Bm
Ku ada disini
Em            G                  A
Pahamilah kau tak pernah sendiri
Bm                              D
Karna aku slalu
G           Em                  A
Di dekatmu saat engkau terjatuh


G       A       Bm
Aku ingin kau merasa
D             A              Bm
Kamu mengerti aku mengerti kamu
G        A       Bm
Aku ingin kau pahami
Em     G           F#
Cintamu bukanlah dia 

B-D#m              G#m 

Dengar laraku
B          D#m                 E
Suara hati ini memanggil namamu
C#m       F#
Karna separuh aku
E
Dirimu


B-D#m              G#m
Dengar laraku
B          D#m                 E
Suara hati ini memanggil namamu
C#m       F#
Karna separuh aku
B-D#m        G#m
Menyentuh laramu
B                   D#m      E
Semua lukamu tlah menjadi lirihku
C#m        F#
Karna separuh aku
E
Dirimu

courtesy : youtube 

Response Essay of Euthanasia

created by : Syariful Anam Rifa'i

DISAGREE WITH EUTHANASIA

            In the article “Euthanasia an Assisted Suicide, It’s Murder In First Degree”, that written by Autumn Buzzel shosw that active euthanasia is extremely wrong because it’s a kind of murder and shouldn’t be allowed. In line with the writer’s, I disagree with euthanasia for some reasons ; Law of the nation, medical view, religion view and comment from the expert.

            We shouldn’t prevent the practice of euthanasia because the practice of euthanasia is decreasing the value of human life. Those who against euthanasia are realize that the human life is sacre and valued. There are four reasons why people think we shouldn’t kill human beings. First, all human being are to be valued, irrespective of age, sex, race, religion, social status or their potential achievement. Second, human life is a basic good as opposed to an instrumental good, a good in itself rather than as ameans to an end. Third, human life is sacred because it is a gift from God therefore the deliberate taking of human life should be prohibited except in self-defence of others. Last, we are valuable for ourselves (BBC-Ethics-Euthanasia,2009)

             If the practice of euthanasia is still continue, so what is the fumction of doctor ? A doctor is a person that heal someone ill. If many doctors are still practicing euthanasia, we will never trust doctors anymore to heal us even we have a terminal ill. dr. Peter Sounders, campaigns director of the Care Not Killing alliance that had galvanised support against a euthanasia law, said : “This debate showed that a clear majority of doctors are opposed to a change in the law. What we now have to do is to understand what such care can offer an that if a law came in, how vulnerable patients might feel under pressure to request an end to life.”(nzherald.co.nz) The practice of euthanasia shul be prohibite because it is almost the same with killing someone or assiste suicide. Overally, killing someone is always a false thing according religion view an law view.euthanasia is against the law in the United Kingdom (UK) where it is illegal to help anyone kill themselves. Voluntary euthanasia or assited suicide can lead to imprisonment of up to fourteen years. (BBC-Ethics of euthanasia,2009)

             Eventhough we hardly and clearly oppositing the pracrice of euthanasia and assiste suicide, there are many people that still agree with euthanasia. Those who pro with euthanasia say, “There is huge difference between killing people who ask for death under appropriate circumtances, and killing people without their permission.” They think that euthanasia is legal and it is not kind of crime. Even though euthanasia is done by permission from the victim, that is still a form of killing someone, and ending someone life. That kind of thing is clearly illegal. In indonesia, that thing break the law. According the laws in section 345 is mentioned : “Any person who intentionally induce others to commit suicide, to help him in the act or to give him the means to it, shall be punished by imprisonment of four years, if the person is so commited suicide.” (hukumkes.wordpress.com,2008). In the religion view, the euthanasia and kind of that are prohibited. In islam, the age of someone had been choosed by Allah and there is no one should disturb that. Allah decides how long each of us will live. In Qur’an at chapter 16 verse 61 mentioned, “When their time comes they cannot delay it for a single hour nor can they bring it forward by a single hour.” (BBC-Religion-Islam,2009) Euthanasia and suicide are not included among the reasons allowed for killing in islam. “Do not take life, which Allah made sacred, other than in the course of justice”, that mentioned in Qur’an 17:33. (BBC-Religion-Islam,2009) So, any kind of euthanasia is not allowed from religion view.

                In conclusion, euthanasia and assisted suicide is should be avoided whatever the reasons, because it decrease the value of human life. However, the human life is sacred and valued, we haave to protect this value.

 

Bibliography

Unknown Author. "BBC-Ethics-Euthanasia". 2009. [Online]. Anti-euthanasia arguments at BBC.co.uk. Date of download: April 03, 2012 at 20:18 PM. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/against/against_1.shtml#section_9

 

Unknown Author. "UK doctors vote to continue opposition of euthanasia". 2006. [Online]. NZ Herald News at BBC.co.uk. Date of download: April 03, 2012 at 21:06 PM. Available: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10389086

 

Unknown Author. "BBC-Ethics of euthanasia". 2009. [Online]. Introduction at BBC.co.uk. Date of download: April 04, 2012 at 3:37 AM. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/overview/introduction.shtml

 

Teknosehat. " Aspek Hukum dalam Pelaksanaan Euthanasia di Indonesia". 2008. [Online]. Hukum Kesehatan at hukumkes.wordpress.com  Date of download: April 04, 2012  at 2:49 AM. Available: http://hukumkes.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/aspek-hukum-dalam-pelaksanaan-euthanasia-di-indonesia/

Unknown Author. " Life is  Sacred". 2009. [Online]. Euthanasia and Suicide at BBC.co.uk. Date of download: April 04, 2012 at 3:32 AM. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/religion/religion.shtml

Unknown Author. " Allah decides how long each of us will live". 2009. [Online]. Euthanasia and Suicide at BBC.co.uk. Date of download: April 04, 2012 at 3:32 AM. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/religion/religion.shtml

Argumentative Essay : Euthanasia

Autumn Buzzell

November 22, 1999

Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: It's Murder in the First Degree

On June 4, 1990, Janet Adkins committed suicide. She killed herself under the supervision of a man named Jack Kevorkian. Again and again, Kevorkian set up machines and killed patients that were supposedly terminally ill. He escaped punishment for years, but on March 26, 1999, Kevorkian was incarcerated for second-degree murder. (Online,99) He had developed many friends and many enemies. One of his followers was a woman who had developed coronary artery disease. Her name was Donna White. She thought about suicide often, especially when her pain was incredibly intense. Help found her before euthanasia did. A hospice care facility heard about her plot to commit suicide, and they found help for her. They provided therapy for her suicidal thoughts and severe depression, and they also provided her with the medication to keep her pain free. She no longer follows Kevorkian's ideals and is against him instead. (Shapiro and Bowermaster, 94) Over 52 patients were killed in "Dr." Kevorkian's presence. (Online, 99) What if they could have found the help that they needed?

Euthanasia is ending one's life if one has a terminal disease is an incurable condition, and is done by a lethal injection. Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide began in ancient Rome and Greece. They believed that it was okay in certain situations to allow a person to die or to help a person die. This was often the case with the elderly in these cultures. Certain religions are against euthanasia. The Christian, Jew, and Islamic religions all cling to the fact that life is sacred and should not be taken away. In some cultures, helping someone to die is the same thing as homicide, and is treated so in a court of law. (Encarta, 98)

Passive euthanasia, or negative euthanasia, is where a doctor or another person does nothing to prevent death, therefore allowing the person to die. Passive euthanasia is not always wrong. It is allowing a person's body to take a natural course of death. Active euthanasia, or positive euthanasia, is when a doctor or another person takes direct action to cause death. (Grolier, 98) Active euthanasia is extremely wrong. It is murder and should not be allowed.

Assisted suicide and active euthanasia is not natural and is extremely unethical. Often times, the effects of painful diseases or severe depression are the cause of suicidal thoughts that result in euthanasia. Jonathan Gould and Lord Craigmyle, authors of Your Death Warrant?, put the suffering of pain in perspective. They say, "Pain and suffering are inescapable at times in life, and sometimes attend its end" but "Pain, it is to be remembered. . . Generally pain can be considered natural and wholesome although unpleasant." There are ways to take away the pain that accompanies deaths. There are so many more choices than poisoning the body unto death. In fact, "medical killing of sick persons would create far more distress, suffering and pain, directly and indirectly, than it would relieve." (Gould and Craigmyle, 71) The number one rule of medicine is that "doctors shall not kill". This regimen has been a priority since the teachings of the well know physician, Hippocrates. (Shapiro and Bowermaster, 94) Some doctors often let their murders slide behind the name of euthanasia. Kevorkian did that very thing. He killed over 52 patients behind the name of euthanasia. By legalizing euthanasia, the United States of America is setting licensed murderers out on the street.

Those in support of euthanasia fight for the right to "die with dignity". They argue that a lethal injection is natural. One must argue with their ideals. Injecting a foreign chemical into the body for the sole purpose of harming the body is not natural. Euthanasia is, in fact, "intentionally making someone die, rather than allowing that person to die naturally". (Online, 98) It is often found that those who argue for the right to "die with dignity" are often the ones who are not terminally ill or in the older generation. This fact was proven in a Harvard study that read, "79 percent of those ages 18 to 34 believe a physician should be allowed to give lethal injections to the terminally ill, but only 53 percent of the older Americans agree." (Shapiro and Bowermaster, 94) Therefore, What are those that are pro-euthanasia arguing for? For their future, or for the death of those who no longer can serve their community?

Every once in a while, the older generation of this country is pressured into selecting euthanization as their course of death. Often times, the elder members of families feel as though they are a burden and, sometimes, they are not of sound mind when they are given the choice of euthanasia. One such instance of that is the case of Kate Cheyney. She was one of the first to be euthanized in the state of Oregon. She was diagnosed with cancer. Once the extreme discomfort set in, her daughter began to press the subject of euthanasia. She was given a psychiatric evaluation to ensure that she was of the right mind. Her psychiatrist could see that her short-term memory was fading and dementia was setting in. Still, he signed her waver and she died by physician assisted suicide. It was not the clean-cut death of dignity that she underwent. It took over an hour of pain for her death to be complete. (Barnett, 99) This illustration reveals one small, but important fact. Though Mrs. Cheyney requested physician-assisted suicide, her daughter, who felt as if her mother was a heavy burden, pressured her into the choice. Her short-term memory was also failing, proving that she was not of right mind to make that decision. One recent study showed that out of the people seeking physician-assisted suicide, "75 percent cited fear of 'being a burden', while only 35 percent gave 'experiencing severe pain" as a reason." (Shapiro, 96) But even the fact of the pain is irrelevant to most people. Joseph Shapiro of U.S. News and World Report found that "five out of six of the reasons a patient says he wants to die are something the medical establishment can treat." Often a person with an ailment or disease is put rest because of the burden that it can cause a family member. It was said by a "Euthanasia Society's spokesman: 'Dying is still often an ugly business, but where should we end up once we admitted the principle that a man may be killed for the benefit of someone else?'" (Gould and Craigmyle, 71)

Those who are for euthanasia argue that the psychiatric evaluations given to patients who are suspected to not be of sound mind, solve the problem of whether or not they are able to choose the "right to die". They also argue that family members of those who are prepared to be euthanize are very supportive. When in fact, not all psychiatric evaluations are complete or true, and not all patients are given an evaluation. The fact is that family members are often supportive only if they choose euthanasia or assisted suicide. The authors of the website, Euthanasia.com found that "emotional and psychological pressures could become overpowering for depressed or dependent people. If the choice of euthanasia is considered as good as a decision to receive care, many people will feel guilty for not choosing death. Financial considerations, added to the concern about 'being a burden,' could serve as powerful forces that would lead a person to 'choose' euthanasia or assisted suicide." Therefore, it is proven that family members and doctors often have persuasive powers over the person in question.

The most important truth about euthanasia, assisted suicide and mercy killing are all forms of murder and, ultimately, homicide. It should be against both the law of the nation, and the law of the heart, because it is unethical. "This issue touches medicine at its very moral center; if this moral center collapses, if physicians become killers, or are even merely licensed to kill, the profession&emdash;and, therewith, each physician&emdash;will never again be worthy of trust and respect, healer and comforter and protector of life in all its frailty. For if medicine's power over life may be used equally to heal or to kill, the doctor is no more a moral professional but rather a morally neutered technician." (Opposing Viewpoints, 89) Unfortunately, physicians can legally murder in the state of Oregon. Still, this quote applies to every state. Physicians who can kill and can commit a homicidal crime, become loose in their morals and accordingly lose their trust as a caretaker, a healer.

Committing this type of murder devalues human life. These doctors act as gods instead of humans&emdash; judging whether life or death shall prevail. The doctor's job is to heal, to try as hard as they can to save the lives of those who are presented before them. Doctors and nurses cannot be gods. Much of the time, they do not understand that what the patient really needs in his or her last days is the love and respect of those around them. In fact, in one study based on "600 ventilator-dependant adults with debilitating neuromuscular conditions" who were asked "whether they were satisfied with their 'life as a whole,' and fully 82 percent responded positively. Only 24 percent of doctors and nurses predicted such positive answers."

Take for instance, Dr. Bry Benjamin. Benjamin once gave out a lethal dose of medicine to an older couple suffering from cancer. For years, he had to "wrestle with this ethical dilemma" and ". . .his conscience. . . alone." (Mattos and Sachs, 96) He will never forget the death sentence that he gave that elderly couple.

In closing, an unnatural death is unethical and should not be permitted. It is the poisoning of a body and may be performed by a licensed doctor. This doctor, a person committed to curing the body of diseases and making it healthy, is committing murder. Murder that should be charged as homicide in a court of law. Euthanasia is a fever that has swept across the country, especially with Jack Kevorkian's aid. The country is sick with "right to die" flu and it is time for the doctors of the United States of America to heal them. They need to start with reorganizing their morals and placing their patient's health and healing at the top of their list. Eventually the country will begin to realize that life is much more important than the emphasis they have been placing on death.

Bibliography

Unknown Author. "Euthanasia: Frequently Asked Questions". 1998. [Online]. International Anti-Euthanasia Task Force at Euthanasia.com. Date of download: November 21, 1999. Available: http://www.iaetf.org/faq.htm

Unknown Author. "Kevorkian Timeline". 1999. [Online]. Euthanasia. Date of download: November 15, 1999. Available: http://www.angelfire.com/al/jefspage/index3.html

Barnett, Erin Hoover. "Is Mom Capable of Choosing to Die?". 1999. [Online]. The Oregonian. Date of Download: November 15, 1999. Available: http://www.oregonlive.com/news/99/10/st101719.html

Cassel, Eric J. "Euthanasia". Grolier Interactive Inc.. 1998 Euthanasia.

Gould, Jonathan and Craigmyle, Lord. Your Death Warrant?. New York: Arlington House, 1971.

Mattos, Jennifer and Sachs, Andrea. "Defining the Right to Die". Time. April 15, 1996. Pg. 82

Rosenbaum, Stuart E. and Baird, Robert M. "Euthanasia: The Moral Issues". 1989. Opposing Viewpoints. New York: Prometheus Books.

Shapiro, Joseph P. and Bowermaster, David. "Death on Trial". U.S. News and World Report. April 25, 1994. Pp. 31-39.

Shapiro, Joseph P. "Expanding a right to die". U.S. News and World Report. April 15, 1996. Pg. 63.

Hari ini kuliah perdana yang bener-bener belajar. Kayaknya udah mulai kuliah efektif. Tetap semangat walaupun belum punya buku pegangan.

Hari ini juga latihan run down untuk demo Perisai Diri yang mana masih diragukan penontonnya banyak atau sedikit. Tapi tetap latihan dengan penuh semangat.

Jadi hari ini intinya tetap semangat !!!

Satria Baja Hitam aja bilang gitu

Hari ini kayaknya sedikit dulu deh. Mau istirahat. Terima kasih. Sekian. Wassalam